There's no technical reason for such restrictions as they pertain to scanning and faxing. Canon knew, or should have known, that its representations and advertisements regarding the All-in-One Printers were false and misleading, and that they failed to disclose material information." As a result, consumers are forced to incur unexpected and unnecessary burden and expense in the form of ink purchases or in the alternative be unable to scan or fax documents using the so-called all-in-one device. "Canon does not represent or warn consumers that ink is a necessary component in order to scan or fax documents. The lawsuit, filed in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (first spotted by Bleeping Computer) claims Canon fails to adequately disclose the restrictions to consumers: It's a policy designed to speed up the rate at which users buy expensive cartridges (god forbid you go a few months just scanning things without adequate levels of magenta), but it's exemplary of the outright hostility that plagues the sector.Īnd now Canon is facing a $5 million lawsuit (pdf) for its behavior. Take for example Canon's history of disabling the scanning and faxing functionality on some printer models if the printer itself runs out of ink.
Canon mx512 printer fax is regrestration necessary software#
Often, software or firmware updates have been designed to intentionally grind printing to a halt if you try to use these alternative options.īeyond that, there are other things printer manufacturers do that make even less sense if a happy customer is the end goal. For more than a decade now, computer printer manufacturers have been engaged in an endless quest called: "let's be as annoying as humanly possible." That quest, driven by a desire to monopolize and boost the sale of their own printer cartridges, has resulted in all manner of obnoxious DRM and other restrictions designed to make using cheaper, third-party printing cartridges a monumental headache.
0 kommentar(er)
